Film Review – Father of the Year (2018)

by Olaf Lesniak
Father of the Year

Netflix continues on with their infamous comedy films starring popular comedians. This time it’s David Spade who becomes the voluntary victim. If you’re here to find out whether you should watch Father of the Year, you’ve come to the right place. The answer is clearly, yes. If you’re the type who likes to waste their time.

The following review will be spoiler free.


Directed by: Tyler Spindel

Written by: Brandon Cournoyer and Tyler Spindel

Starring: David Spade, Nat Faxon, Joey Bragg, Matt Shively, Brigit Mendler, and Jared Sandler

Playing off of the famous “My dad can beat up your dad” argument somebody thought it was a good idea to make a movie about it, only with an overdone twist: both have incompetent dads. That’s what it comes off as in the beginning as it later explores the relationship between sons and fathers — more so tries to.


There’s not much worthy of mention. The title changed from Who Do You Think Would Win to Graduates to Father of the Year and that’s pretty much it. That said it abundantly reminds me of the quality of storylines I would write for my 5-minute skits for class projects in middle school. Who knows, maybe that’s where the script idea originated from?

A Series of Convenient Events

Father of the Year

image via

Nothing is more painful than watching a set-up happening to a joke that doesn’t stick the landing. Now imagine watching a compilation of canonical clips with the length of a feature film. Unfunny jokes are one thing, but these ones outright disrespect the intelligence of the viewer.

The priority is to attempt at any comedy that fills the time instead of the one that rewards yours or is, you know, funny. They’re moments when, in following cuts, props and people would end up in a spot they shouldn’t find themselves at — it’s not logical. In some scenes characters would deal with consequences they weren’t responsible for and in others, they would ignore any implications of a conflict.

Father of the Year

image via Roger Ebert

Characters do not act naturally in their surroundings. Their response would vary between these three things: say something illogical, sarcastic or cartoonishly obscure. A rock could fall from space and make a hole in someone’s head and they would still move on with their regular life.

They’d even show you the same scene from a different point of view, only for it to run longer, creating a hole in the continuity. But the filmmakers expect the viewer to ignore these fundamental issues as if the jokes are the substitution for the explanation.

The Killing Crickets

I went after the execution but now it’s time to comment on the comedy itself. There are too many instances that would require for me to spoil the movie to truly put into perspective how rudimentary it was. Slapstick or creepy humor isn’t bad within itself. If it comes out of nowhere with intention of bathos, that’s where it brings out its primitiveness. A lot of times it does feel like a middle-schooler wrote the script.

Father of the Year

image via YouTube’s HitComps

Every scene ends on the most unexciting note you could think of.  It’s as if the filmmakers thought the more anti-climactic a scene is, the funnier it becomes. This makes the gags expected and predictable. You’ve already watched plenty of comedies with the same jokes.

The decisions that characters make are poorly justified because of their one-dimensional personalities. They represent toxic simplicity and lifelessness. Everyone has one thing that makes them distinct from one another and they run it into the ground.

The Fall of Nothing

Another thing that makes Father of the Year stand out is its lack of production value. The lighting in-doors stands and the camera work is worse than in a CW TV show. The camera shakes whenever capturing more physical movements like running. Editing sometimes comes off as rushed.

What’s worse is it feels as if more than one person directed the movie. There are several scenes that purposefully attempt to capture specific sequences with a different style which would regularly be refreshing if not so awkwardly handled.

Father of the Year

image via

Having said that, there is one positive and it’s the one scene that involves VR which truly does something different and never seen before. It was the only stroke of originality which even garnered a smile — although getting to that joke was yet again at the expense of the plot. I happily recommend finding the one scene on YouTube.

Final Thoughts

Father of the Year is more of a hate letter to dads than anything else. It tries to tackle themes such as the son-father relationship without actually trying to convey or represent anything. The only good laugh you’ll get out of this one is when you find out this is Netflix’s attempt to compete in the movie market.

Suddenly I feel more sympathetic with what Spielberg had to say.

Grade: F

Father of the Year

image via Film and TV Now

Thank you for reading! Were you another casualty who watched Father of the Year? Comment down below!

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to MovieBabble via email to stay up to date on the latest content.

Join MovieBabble on Patreon so that new content will always be possible.

What movie topic should I discuss next? Whether it be old or new, the choice is up to you!

Related Articles


Happy 20th Kuzco!!!!! | MovieBabble December 16, 2020 - 9:05 am

[…] David Spade (yes, that David Spade) as Kuzco, the spoiled Emperor of a vaguely pre-Incan Peruvian civilization, and John Goodman as […]

Liz Gauffreau July 23, 2018 - 8:07 pm

Sounds pretty lame.

Candi July 23, 2018 - 7:44 pm

Good review! I saw it pop up as new on Netflix but I knew it wouldn’t be worth my time and you just confirmed it.

Nick Kush July 23, 2018 - 9:41 am

Want to join the MovieBabble staff? Check out this link in your browser to get started:
Be sure to check out the MovieBabble Patreon page:


Leave a Comment Below!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.